Facial recognition, the Government decree is delayed: there is the issue of data without authorization

Facial recognition, the Government decree is delayed: there is the issue of data without authorization

The facial recognition system is active in a public place. It frames faces, captures them, compares them. But the public prosecutor has not authorized the operation or the prescribed terms have not been respected. The rule, in the draft decree on artificial intelligence in police activities, seems clear: the use is “immediately stopped and all personal data, results and outputs acquired and produced are deleted.”

Read more Biorsaf, digital platform for food safety

Ask the Sun

In-depth questions generated by 24Ore AI

The questions are automatically suggested by 24Ore AI
based on the content viewed.

It seems so. Because immediately after, the rule opens a door: “subject to elements legitimately acquired under another legal basis.” Which one? And in which cases can images collected without the required authorization be retained? The draft, except for a reference to Legislative Decree 51 of 2018 on the processing of personal data in police activities, does not clarify this. And here the risk of a regulatory gap on the management of biometric data emerges.

AI Act and facial recognition: the issue of Article 8

The point is contained in Article 8, paragraph 8, of the draft approved on August 4 by the Council of Ministers. It is the legislative decree called to adapt the Italian system to EU Regulation 2024/1689, the so-called AI Act, also regulating the use of artificial intelligence in police activities.

Read more Copernicus: August 2026 was the hottest month ever recorded

Real-time biometric recognition is allowed, but within strict limits. The formulation adopted by the government, however, leaves open a decisive passage: the fate of data that must not be deleted because “legitimately acquired under another legal basis.”

The draft does not explicitly identify the cases. It only refers to Legislative Decree 51 of 2018, which regulates the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of prevention, investigation, ascertainment, and prosecution of crimes. The concrete scope of the exception, however, remains to be defined.

Read more Center-right, Calabria laboratory. Here’s why the by-elections are a test

Translated from

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *